In the past such a question would be judged "over the top," hysterical, even crazy.
But, briefly, if you will follow me I think I can show it is a legitimate question. I have already asked the question previously whether the sham elections of last autumn violate the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights, which guarantees "genuine" elections. Over the past weeks and now months I have been giving evidence for the fact that said elections cannot be considered genuine.
Unknown to most people the same declaration says citizens are entitled to the free flow of information. I will get the exact language soon, for that is important. For now, we know that a democracy cannot function without the free flow of information. This should and does mean the free flow of accurate information. Withholding information is just as bad as putting out incorrect information.
To be sure, these are serious accusations. And for the moment I am only raising the question, not making accusations. However, if one follows the logic -- and the evidence of election (as opposed to voter) fraud is apparent -- the withholding of such information could also be considered a crime against democracy.
Let us be about the business of discovering the truth. We are Internet people. We can do this!
But, briefly, if you will follow me I think I can show it is a legitimate question. I have already asked the question previously whether the sham elections of last autumn violate the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights, which guarantees "genuine" elections. Over the past weeks and now months I have been giving evidence for the fact that said elections cannot be considered genuine.
Unknown to most people the same declaration says citizens are entitled to the free flow of information. I will get the exact language soon, for that is important. For now, we know that a democracy cannot function without the free flow of information. This should and does mean the free flow of accurate information. Withholding information is just as bad as putting out incorrect information.
To be sure, these are serious accusations. And for the moment I am only raising the question, not making accusations. However, if one follows the logic -- and the evidence of election (as opposed to voter) fraud is apparent -- the withholding of such information could also be considered a crime against democracy.
Let us be about the business of discovering the truth. We are Internet people. We can do this!
No comments:
Post a Comment
Thank you for commenting. All comments are moderated. Your comment will be reviewed as quickly as possible. Off-topic or inappropriate will not be considered. Timely and appropriate messages are most welcome.